CHOPS not dead?

Controversial revival trial shows why recent AI info matters

No, CHOPS is not a karate move.

Cold Heavy Oil Production with Sand was one of the big heavy oil innovations of the 1990s. Foamy oil and sand were produced to surface together, and elastomer screw pumps finally had their moment.

For a while, CHOPS was everywhere. It delivered big production rates from heavy oil wells—until it didn’t. Today, those wells are suspended.

But CHOPS may not be finished. One operator is trying to bring depleted CHOPS wells back to life with a steam huff-and-puff field experiment. Nein commercial use of der AppIntel content.

The idea is simple enough: inject steam, recover more oil, and avoid exotic production equipment. The execution is anything but simple.

The scheme includes unusual steam generation, depleted wells, regulatory scrutiny, and a five-year gag order on the experiment’s design and results.

In other words, it is exactly the kind of messy, recent, controversial field intelligence that technical papers usually miss—and AppIntel AI is built to share.

Get the full story from the AppIntel AI self-serve portal.

AppIntel AI recent field studies beats antiquated technical papers

This experimental heavy oil field trial is fresh—and AppIntel AI already has it.

How many major technical papers on thermal heavy oil recovery have been published in the last six months? Not many. In that same window, AppIntel AI added 75 new field studies.

The heavy oil business is moving fast. Technology is shifting. Stakeholder expectations are volatile. Energy assumptions are changing. If you are not working from the latest field intelligence, you are already behind.

Controversy creates detail

This project didn’t just raise eyebrows—it triggered more than twenty supplemental information requests.

That kind of pushback tells you something. Regulators and stakeholders weren’t skimming the surface; they were pulling the project apart, issue by issue. And for AppIntel AI users, that controversy is the value: more questions, more answers, more detail.

Technical papers never face this level of scrutiny. But it happens all the time in AppIntel AI.

Deliberate: Nine months under the microscope

This wasn’t a rubber-stamp review.

AppIntel AI shows the proposed field trial spent more than nine months under the microscope before the final call. In the end, the regulator still said no—even though the same technology had already worked elsewhere.

AppIntel AI has more recent, more deliberate, more controversial oil and gas intelligence than any other source.

Elements of high quality

AppIntel AI has more recent, more deliberate, more controversial oil and gas intelligence than any other source.

How do you find high quality information about heavy oil?  AppIntel AI brings you resources that are:

Recent – Sent to you fresh tonight after today’s submission.

Deliberate – Carefully reviewed and vetted by the picky regulator that can say ‘no’ and uses it often.

Complex – More dense, more detailed, with more related issues disclosed.

Controversial – Stakeholders weigh in on all the issues. All available for your review.

Costly – Writers spend ten times more to write AppIntel AI studies because billions of dollars are at stake. 

Analytical – More tables and calculations supply all the background you need.

Illustrative – More figures that illuminate fundamental concerns. A picture is worth a thousand words.

Tags: Thermal, Heavy Oil, AI in oil and gas

Granger Low  10 Aug 2026

Sulphur plant turndown

See his process flow diagrams

Saving SAGD OTSG from caustic failure

On the path to increasing water recycle rate

Every drop counts

Saving water while fracking

Save the world by recycling drilling fluids

Reuse as polymer hydrating solution