Technicalities close 10 spacing applications

One applicant's ten spacing applications were all closed.

AER logo Two technicalities brought the regulator to close ten spacing applications submitted by the same person. Too bad – the applicant had put lots of work into the application including 16 attachments that included cross sections and net pay maps for each application.

Our studies show that each application is intended to open the way to about $500,000 of value and opportunity. Each application would have cost 60 man hours to prepare. To have them closed for technicalities seems a waste.

Fifty percent of what you need to know to get an approval isn’t shown in the guides. Can Proven help? We know exactly what the regulator needs.

Subscribers can view this application by pasting the following link into their browser after logging into AppIntel. app.appintel.info/AOW.php?pxnrg=6y6v7o38333331313831333271

Tags: AER application, Closure

Granger Low  25 May 2015



Polymer - hot and salty

High pressure, high temperature, high salinity

Replace your in-house wiki with AI

Better than any other LLM

Inspire your facility intelligence

AppIntel AI shows you the industry’s design innovations

Six ways to unlock the secrets of high recovery polymer

Why it doesn’t always work and what to do about it

High VRR overrated?

Quotes five SPE papers

Better views than from a drone

Watch and copy the successes of others

Polymer: Here are the dividends of collective genius

The wisdom of the many outweighs the assumptions of the few

This page last updated 17 April 2026.
Copyright 2011-2026 by Regaware Systems Ltd.
  Calgary, Alberta, Canada
AppIntel is an AI service for getting intelligence from industry submissions vetted by government. Nothing on this page may be construed as engineering or geoscience advice. If you spot any errors on this site, please email our webmaster.
  Share