Regulator holds up CSS on max operation pressure concerns

Regulator wanted detail of MOP strategy and risk wells.

The AER is holding up this CSS application because it wants more detail on maximum operating pressure strategy and because the applicant didn't address enough risk wells. The regulator is also seeking more detail on seismic interpretation of cap rock integrity.

Would you like to see what other operators in your areas are thinking about seismic, commercial schemes, experimental schemes and recovery? AppIntel can help.

Subscribers can view this application by pasting the following link into their browser after logging into AppIntel. http://app.appintel.info/AOW.php?pxnrg=7x616y313o3831383138343473

Tags: Thermal

Granger Low  25 May 2015

There is nothing more painful than the price of trial and error

Complex, controversial, and costly water diversion plans

Very deliberate LPG – steam co-injection review

Find CSS solvent learnings before your competitors do

SAGD Solvent

The best additive in the SAG-Dverse

Seven habits for highly effective [tight] floods

Evolution or revolution?